论文部分内容阅读
作为体育组织自治解决争端的重要方式,国际体育仲裁院仲裁在解决与体育有关的争端中发挥着越来越大的作用。同时,进行必要的司法审查,是保障体育仲裁裁决公正的必要手段,主要包括撤销仲裁裁决及承认与执行裁决两种形式。考察实践可见,国内法院在司法审查过程中,充分尊重体育仲裁裁决,限制司法审查的事项和内容,这一趋势充分体现了体育行业的自治特性。体育仲裁裁决司法审查标准的完善,尚需在司法介入与体育自治之间寻求平衡。通过司法审查,推动体育自治规则法律化的进程,增强体育争端解决的公正性。
As an important way for sports organizations to solve their disputes autonomously, CIETAC arbitration plays an increasingly important role in resolving sports-related disputes. At the same time, the necessary judicial review is the necessary means to ensure the fairness of the sports arbitration ruling, which mainly includes the withdrawal of arbitral awards and the recognition and enforcement of rulings. According to the inspection practice, the domestic courts fully respect the sports arbitration ruling and restrict the matters and contents of judicial review during the judicial review process. This trend fully reflects the autonomy characteristics of the sports industry. The improvement of the judicial review standard of sports arbitration ruling still needs to strike a balance between judicial intervention and sports autonomy. Through judicial review, to promote the legalization of sports autonomous rules of the process, enhance the fairness of sports dispute settlement.