日前,安徽省濉溪县法院对原告高某等132人与被告濉溪县马桥乡军王村前圩4组及第三人周某山园承包合同纠纷一案作出判决,判决被告前圩4组与周某签订的山园承包合同无效;周某于判决生效后5日内将承包的山园返还给被告前圩4组,同时,被告前圩4组返还周某承包费400元。 原告高某等132人与周某均为被告前 Recently, Taixi County Court of Anhui Province ruled 132 cases of plaintiff Gao and other defendants and the defendant Suqian County Mawang Township Qianxu 4 groups and third-person Zhou Mouyuan contract dispute case, the verdict of the defendant group 4 Zhou signed a contract with the Mountain Park is invalid; Zhou Mou within 5 days after the entry into force of the contract will be returned to the mountain before the defendant Fair 4, meanwhile, the defendant before the 4 groups to return the contract Zhou 400 contract fee. 132 high-level plaintiffs and Zhou are both before the defendant