我在2015年第4期《小学语文教师》上拜读了方德佺老师的《由“补白”想到的》(以下简称“方文”),对文中的观点不敢苟同,愿与方老师商榷。“方文”说:“从文章作者的角度看,把作者有意留出的‘空白’补写出来,难免有画蛇添足、狗尾续貂之嫌。作者为什么要留白?是他们行文至此突然丧失了想象力吗?绝对不是!小学生不懂此道尚在情理之中,但作为教师不懂此道就很说不过去了。”众所周知,《红楼梦》后四十回为高鹗所著。尽管他的水平不低,但始终有人认为是狗尾续貂。方老师批评 I read the “By” “Thought ” (hereinafter referred to as “Fang Wen ”) on the “Primary School Chinese Teacher” No. 4 in 2015 and disagreed with the views in the article and would like to Discuss with Teacher Fang. “Fang Wen ” said: “From the point of view of the author of the article, it is inevitable that the authors write off the ’blank’ that the author intends to leave out, and it is inevitable that the author should suspend the mink. The imagination? Absolutely not! Pupils do not understand this Tao is still reasonable, but as a teacher do not know this is a very justified. ”As we all know,“ Dream of Red Mansions ”after 40 times for Gao Bing. Although his level is not low, but there are always people think it is dogtail ferret. Fang criticized