论文部分内容阅读
法律推理将知识、命题、范式与推论等因素综合起来,实现合目的性判决。随着现代法治的社会意识形态、哲学思维方式、法律技术方法的深度演化,主体与客体、理性与价值、历史与现实、技术与理念等随之发生改变,法律现实主义、自由法学以及经典形式逻辑之间产生交涉与碰撞。在涉及到交叉性问题的时候难以就边缘性问题予以周延的思考与制度性的安排,促使法律推理不能仅停留在法律规范层面上建构大前提,而必须充分考量现实中进行法律解释的理性与现实的平衡,使得一般的逻辑涵摄模式充分兼顾法律事实对法律规范的隐射以及法律规范对法律事实的适用。法律实践中,在事实向规范以及由规范向审判的转化中,既要考虑从内容极为复杂的法律体系中寻找大前提,又涉及小前提即法律事实的确定,就链接过程而言,需要不断研究法律事实与法律规范间最合理、最密切联系的策略,探索建立关于事实、规范与价值的结构体系。
Legal reasoning combines knowledge, proposition, paradigm and reasoning to achieve the purposeful judgment. With the modern ideology of the rule of law in the social ideology, philosophical thinking, the depth of evolution of legal and technical methods, the subject and object, rationality and value, history and reality, technology and philosophy change, legal realism, liberal law and the classic form Negotiation and collision between logic. When it comes to cross-cutting issues, it is difficult to consider the issue of marginalization and institutional arrangements to promote the legal reasoning can not just stay at the level of legal norms to build the premise, but must take full account of the reality of legal interpretation of the rational and The realistic balance makes the general logic model of taking full account of the concealment of legal norms by legal facts and the application of legal norms to legal facts. In the practice of law, both in the factual norms and in the transformation from norms to trials, it is necessary to consider finding the major premise from the extremely complicated legal system as well as the small premise, that is, the legal fact, and it is necessary for the linking process to continue To study the most reasonable and most relevant strategy between legal fact and legal norms and to explore the establishment of a structural system of facts, norms and values.