论文部分内容阅读
在法国,传统上而言,司法功能的领土化过程依赖于下列两个司法领土概念之间的关系:其一是雅各宾政权遗留的司法领土概念;其二则主要是社会活动中所涉及的司法领土的概念以及社会发展和公民所需要的司法领土的概念。1958年12月22日的改革很好地回应了第一个概念,但这次改革仅构成了一个特例,不具有普遍性的特征。在其所实施的措施中,大多数政治代表的影响力促成了和解方案的产生以及保守主义的生成。尽管如此,在公共权力结构的变化及公共权力行使范围的变化过程中,司法力量的参与仍旧促进了社会改革的产生,同时这些改革也记录了司法系统自身领土的实际变化过程。
Traditionally in France, the process of territorialization of judicial function has relied on the relationship between the concepts of the following two judicial territories: one is the concept of judicial territory left behind by the Jacopo regime; the other is mainly concerned with social activities The concept of judicial territory and the concept of judicial territory required by social development and citizens. The reform of December 22, 1958 responds well to the first concept, but this reform constitutes only a special case and does not have universal characteristics. In the measures it has implemented, the influence of most political representatives has led to the emergence of reconciliation programs and the emergence of conservatism. Nevertheless, during the process of changes in the structure of public power and changes in the scope of exercise of public power, the participation of judicial forces still promoted the emergence of social reforms, and these reforms also recorded the actual process of changes in the territory of the judicial system itself.