“洛阳风波”引出的“档案”话题 1993年4月,一年一度的牡丹花会在洛阳举行,文化搭台,经济唱戏。各大企业纷纷在交通干道两旁树立产品广告牌。以生产火腿肠而名扬全国的洛阳春都集团所属肉联厂,委托一家广告公司承办该厂广告。这家广告公司既没有按城建规定程序施工,也没向有关单位请示,就雇用民工施工,结果使打入地下的钢钎截断通信电缆,使洛阳市内1730对电话线路瞬时失灵。造成直接经济损失20.8万元。时值牡丹花会期间,电话不通,直接影响了正常的经贸活动,间接经济损失无法估算。同时,还影响了市民正常的工作和生活,后果极为严重。 中国青年报1993年8月24日刊登了一篇题为《洛阳1730对电话瞬间失灵——特大通讯事故谁之过?》的报道,但综观全文,对“谁之过”的分析并不十 “Luoyang storm” leads to the “file” topic In April 1993, the annual Peony Flower will be held in Luoyang, culture, stage, economic singing. Major companies have set up billboards on both sides of the traffic trunk. Produced ham sausage and famous throughout the country Luoyang Chundu Group affiliated meat factory, commissioned an advertising company to undertake the factory ads. The advertising company did not follow the procedures specified in the construction of urban construction, nor the relevant units requested instructions on the construction of employment of migrant workers, the result of underground cables into the underground communications cables cut off, so that the telephone lines in Luoyang City, 1730 instant failure. Caused a direct economic loss of 208,000 yuan. During the Peony Festival, the call was barred, which directly affected the normal economic and trade activities. Indirect economic losses could not be estimated. At the same time, it has also affected the normal work and life of the public. The consequences are extremely serious. China Youth Daily published an article on August 24, 1993 entitled “Luoyang 1730 Instantaneous Failure on the Phone - Who Told Over the Accident of Large Communications?” However, a full analysis of the “Who’s Who” analysis is not ten