论文部分内容阅读
在人类学研究领域中,当“女性”分析范畴尚属一片空白之时,“男性”却在民族志研究的中心舞台上拥有了一席之地,研究者丝毫没有顾及到潜在的文化元素,不论是内在的还是外在的(即内部构成上的或外部结构上的),“男性化主义”都被当成了社会的人造产物,而未被看作是生物自然力量的结果。以往的许多研究对更早前该学科过分男性化(或者只考虑男性)的趋势采取了一种应对和纠正的态度,认为其缺乏对女性真正的关注。在近30年里,许多形式的人类学调查、分析以及理论构建都非常认真地关注着女性(指妇女和女童)的生活经历、社会地位、机构设置、身份认同等,它们发展迅速,在理论与文化层面变得越来越丰富多样。
In the field of anthropology, “men ” has a place in the central stage of ethnographic research when the category of “femininity ” is still blank. Researchers do not consider the potential cultural elements , Both internal and external (ie, internal or external), are “masculine” as social artifacts and are not seen as the result of biological natural forces. Many previous studies have taken a coping and correcting attitude towards the tendency of the subject to be overly masculine (or only male) earlier, arguing that it lacks real attention to women. In the past 30 years, many forms of anthropological investigation, analysis and theoretical construction have paid very attentive attention to the life experiences, social status, institutional settings and identities of women (referring to women and girls). They have developed rapidly. In theory And the cultural level becomes more and more diverse.