论文部分内容阅读
目的:对Weinstein噪声敏感性(WNS)量表进行中文版修订和信效度检验。方法:采用翻译后量表对大学生进行施测,238名大学生完成了初测,267名大学生完成了再测。结果:1探索性因素分析表明,中文版WNS量表具有一个维度,包括15个题项,一个主因素可解释总变异的32.77%;验证性因素表明,单因素模型对数据拟合程度良好,(2/df=1.955,RMSEA=0.065,GFI=0.911,NFI=0.836,CFI=0.911,IFI=0.913,TLI=0.896);中文版WNS量表相容效度良好,WNS总分和噪声烦躁得分之间显著正相关(r=0.499,P<0.01);2中文版WNS量表内部一致性信度为0.866,分半信度为0.871,重测信度为0.743(P<0.01);3噪声敏感性不存在性别差异和年级差异。结论:中文版WNS量表具有良好的信效度,可以作为噪声敏感性测量的工具。
OBJECTIVE: To conduct a Chinese version of the Weinstein noise-sensitivity (WNS) scale and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: The post-translational scale was used to test college students. 238 college students completed the preliminary test and 267 college students completed the retest. Results: 1 The exploratory factor analysis showed that the Chinese version of the WNS scale has one dimension, including 15 items, one of which can account for 32.77% of the total variation. The confirmatory factor shows that the single factor model fits the data well, (2 / df = 1.955, RMSEA = 0.065, GFI = 0.911, NFI = 0.836, CFI = 0.911, IFI = 0.913, TLI = 0.896). The Chinese version of WNS scale has good compatibility, WNS score and noise irritability score (R = 0.499, P <0.01). The internal consistency reliability of the Chinese version of WNS was 0.866, the semi-reliability was 0.871, and the test-retest reliability was 0.743 (P <0.01) There are no gender differences and grade differences in sensitivity. Conclusion: The Chinese version of the WNS scale has good reliability and validity and can be used as a tool for noise sensitivity measurement.