今年《新闻战线》第三期,肖新生同志在《记者业务探讨》专栏中谈到以“静态采访”作为记者摆脱“尴尬”境地的手段。我想,这个问题很有商榷的价值。对于一个年轻的记者,“无知”不属“丑行”,而无知+固执,就不仅讨嫌,而且是致命的弱点。“静态采访”若作为记者的十八般武艺之一种是可取的,若作为摆脱尴尬境地的办法,则可能有害而无益。从肖新生同志文中引用的记者与武钢某厂被采访者五个回合的对话,不难看出,双方都很自负。记者缺乏常识,准备不足,又固执已见,更显捉襟见肘。而被采访者显然对此反感,不失礼貌地进行了有分寸的反唇相讥。如此采访, In the third issue of this year’s “news front,” Comrade xiaoxin talked about “static interview” as a reporter’s way out of “embarrassment” in his column of “Reporters’ Business Discussion.” I think this question is very open to question. To a young journalist, “ignorance” is not an “ugly act,” but ignorance and stubbornness are not only suspicions but also fatal weaknesses. “Static interviewing” If it is desirable that one of the eighteen martial arts as a journalist be desirable, it can be detrimental and useless as a way of getting out of an awkward position. The reporter quoted from Xiao Xinsheng’s comrade and the dialogue of the five rounds interviewed by a factory in Wuhan Iron and Steel Company made it easy to see that both parties are very conceited. Reporter lack of common sense, lack of preparation, stubbornness has been seen, even more stretched. The respondents apparently aversion to it, politely conducted a contemptuous retort. Such an interview,