论文部分内容阅读
姚柱林在《戏不能“散”吗?》(载《南粤剧作》1986年第二期)一文中说,如果一个戏被认为“散”,那就近乎说这个戏是写失败了。果真如此吗?不然。有不少戏剧名著从表面上看来亦都是“散”的。这说明一个戏外在形式上的散,并不就意味着一个戏不好。近年来,在话剧创作上有不少人已经在作这种努力,他们就是敢于冒犯剧情“散”之大不韪。我国过去的剧作,普遍地存在着过分“提纯”,过分“凝聚”,过多的“政治负荷”,直奔单一的主题,脱离社会生活全景,我们再也不能过多地从“散”不散的角度去要求一个戏了。表面上的散,如果恰好是内在思想含
In a passage entitled “Can not Disseminate” “?” (In the second issue of the Southern Cantonese Opera, 1986), Yao Zhulin said that if a drama is considered “loose”, it is almost said that the play is a failure. Is this really true? There are quite a few famous dramas on the surface which are also “scattered”. This shows that the casual appearance of a drama does not mean that a drama is not good. In recent years, many people in drama creation have been making such efforts. They dare to offend the plot “San” big. In the dramas of our country in the past, there were widespread “purifications”, excessive “cohesion” and excessive “political burden”, heading straight toward a single theme and breaking away from the panorama of social life. We can no longer afford to excessively “scatter” To play a non-stop perspective. On the surface scattered if it happens to be contained within the mind