就低人均收入而言,一定水平的收入不均度更具有后果性。然而,就普遍性而言,低发达国家收入不均水平却比发达国家高。这两种事实已经激发起关于矫正收入不均是否比发展重要的论争。收入均匀导向型发展战略的反对者们指出,发展理论和新近发达起来的国家经验都表明,按照常规,在经济过程中,收入不均度先是增多,然后再缩减。他们辨解地说道,反对增长、强调平等是反生产力论的,强调收入均匀将推迟增长,并且会让高水平的收入不均和绝对贫困持续存在下去。收入均匀导向型发展战略的拥护论者们反对上述论调。他们提出质疑,增长和收入不均相互替代性是否存在;他们也争辨地说道,即使是暂时性的高收入不均度也是不可容忍的;他们还追问,增长究竟会不会引致收入不均度的增大?他们指出,今天发展中国家面临 In terms of low per capita income, a certain level of income inequality is even more consequential. However, in terms of universality, the income inequality of the less developed countries is higher than that of the developed countries. Both of these facts have inspired controversy over whether the correction of uneven incomes is more important than development. Opponents of an even-income-oriented development strategy point out that both the theory of development and the newly developed national experiences show that, as a general rule, in the economic process, the income inequality first increases and then decreases again. They disparagedly said that to oppose growth and emphasize equality as an anti-propensity theory, stressing that even income will delay growth and allow a high level of income inequality and absolute poverty to persist. Proponents of an even-income-oriented development strategy oppose the argument. They questioned the existence of substitutable growth and income inequality; they argued arguably that even temporary high-income inequalities were intolerable; they also questioned whether growth would lead to unequal income Increased degree? They pointed out that developing countries are facing today