论文部分内容阅读
目的了解固定宣传栏对学生结核病防治知识知晓率的影响,为进一步做好学校结核病防治工作提供依据。方法 2014年10月,选择甘肃省白银市会宁县2013年安装了固定宣传栏的一所高中为干预组,随机抽取一年内未发现肺结核病患者的4个班级207名学生作为调查对象;选择白银市靖远县未安装固定宣传栏的一所高中为对照组,随机抽取4个班级229名学生作为调查对象;采用8条结核病核心信息开展现场问卷调查,以知晓率和构成比作为评价指标。结果采用固定宣传栏开展宣传活动的干预组,结核病防治知识总知晓率为74.94%,对照组为59.12%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=97.949,P<0.05);3条结核病基础知识知晓率,干预组为87.44%,对照组为48.03%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=76.055,P<0.05);2条结核病预防知识知晓率,干预组为40.96%,对照组为11.35%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=47.905,P<0.05);正确回答8条(χ2=6.396)和7条(χ2=44.465)信息的人数所占比例,干预组和对照组差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05);正确回答6条(χ2=0.228)和5条(χ2=2.583)信息的人数所占比例,干预组和对照组差异无统计学意义(均P>0.05);正确回答5条及以上信息者,干预组189人(占91.30%),对照组131人(占57.21%),两者差异有统计学意义(χ2=64.740,P<0.05)。结论白银市安装了固定宣传栏干预组学生的结核病防治知识知晓率明显高于未安装的对照组,说明安装固定宣传栏可提高学生结核病防治知识知晓率,应进一步推广应用。
Objective To understand the influence of the fixed bulletin board on the awareness rate of TB prevention and treatment among students and provide the basis for further prevention and control of tuberculosis in schools. Methods In October 2014, a high school with a fixed bulletin board in Huining County, Baiyin City, Gansu Province was selected as the intervention group. 207 students from 4 classes with no TB cases were randomly selected for the survey in one year. Silver was selected Jingyuan County, Jingyuan County did not install a fixed bulletin board as a control group of high school, 229 students were randomly selected four classes as the survey; using 8 core information on-site survey of tuberculosis, awareness and composition ratio as the evaluation index. Results The total awareness rate of tuberculosis prevention and control was 74.94% in the intervention group with publicity bulletin board and 59.12% in the control group (χ2 = 97.949, P <0.05). The awareness rate of the three basic knowledge of tuberculosis (Χ2 = 76.055, P <0.05). The awareness rate of two TB prevention knowledge was 40.96% in the intervention group and 11.35% in the control group, with a significant difference between the two groups (87.44% in the intervention group and 48.03% in the control group (Χ2 = 47.905, P <0.05). There were significant differences between the intervention group and the control group (P> 0.05). There were significant differences between the two groups (χ2 = 6.396) and the seven (χ2 = 44.465) <0.05). There was no significant difference between the intervention group and the control group (P> 0.05). The correct answer was for the proportion of 6 (χ2 = 0.228) and 5 (χ2 = 2.583) The above information, intervention group 189 (91.30%), control group of 131 (57.21%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2 = 64.740, P <0.05). Conclusion The awareness rate of tuberculosis prevention and control knowledge among students in the fixed bulletin board intervention group was significantly higher than that of the uninstalled control group in Baiyin City, indicating that the installation of a fixed bulletin board can raise the awareness rate of tuberculosis prevention and control among students and should be further popularized and applied.