在我的印象中,所谓学院派著作,一般比较讲究学术规范,重视材料梳理和逻辑分析。眼前这本凝聚了哈九增先生十几年研究心得的专著《鲁迅与严复》,更加深了我的这种印象。鲁迅与严复的研究虽早已各成显学,但将二者加以比较,考察严复对鲁迅的思想影响,则未见有专著。这专题极重要,又不易取巧,涉及的问题像是露出海面的冰山一角,一个小问题常常会牵发一串问题。没有沉潜往复的学术积累难有收获。作者立论审慎,评价中肯,虽涉及很多理论问题,但读来全无生涩之感。西方学术界认为,一个思想家的思想起源和早期著作比他已经定型了的成熟思想更重要。按海德格尔的说法,重要的是道路,而不是著作。著作容易被僵化为教条或割裂成思想的碎片,道路则显 In my impression, the so-called academic writings, generally more emphasis on academic norms, emphasis on material sorting and logical analysis. This book now condensed the work of more than ten years Mr. Ha Jiuzeng study monograph “Lu Xun and Yan Fu,” deepened my impression. Although the study of Lu Xun and Yan Fu has long been a significant study, but to compare the two, to examine the influence of Yan Fu on Lu Xun, there is no monograph. This topic is extremely important and not easy to make ends meet. The problems involved are like the tip of the iceberg that exposes the sea. A small problem often leads to a series of problems. There is no hard-earned academic accumulation without subsidence. The author is prudent in his argument and appraised in a fair manner. Although many theoretical problems are involved, his reading has no sense of origin. Western academia believes that the origins and early writings of a thinker are more important than the mature ideas that he has shaped. According to Heidegger, what matters is the road, not the work. The writings can easily be rigidized into dogma or fragmented into thought pieces, the road is obvious