《美术观察》2007年4期的“设计批评”栏目刊发了杭间先生的《设计“公社”》一文。读罢,感到迷惑。为此,就两个问题提出疑问,与杭间先生商榷。一、“公社”——理想集体实现?出生在上世纪六七十年代的中国设计师都知道,“公社”几乎是“大锅饭”的同义词。显然,我国1958年大跃进时期的“公社”与19世纪法国大革命时期的“巴黎公社”完全不是一码事(对 The article “Design Criticism” of “Art Observation” in 2007 4 published the article “Design Commune” by Mr. Hang. Read, feel confused. Therefore, we should raise questions about the two questions and discuss with Mr. Hang. First, the “commune” - the ideal of collective realization? Born in 1960s and 1970s Chinese designers know that “Commune ” is almost synonymous with “big pot”. Obviously, the “commune” of our country during the Great Leap Forward of 1958 is totally different from the “Paris Commune” of the French Revolution of the 19th century