论文部分内容阅读
自1997年12月至1999年12月,我院应用美国产可吸收无损伤合成缝合线行会阴切口皮内缝合192例(观察组),并随机抽取同期会阴切口传统丝线缝合186例作对照组。结果分析如下。1 资料与方法1.1 一般资料 两组孕妇年龄、营养状态、会阴切开指征等均无差异。术后常规应用口服抗生素预防感染。1.2 手术方法 对照组186例按传统常规缝合,先用1-0肠线缝合阴道粘膜、会阴肌肉、皮下组织,4号丝线间断缝合皮肤。4d拆线,产钳切口5d拆线。观察组192例用可吸收无损伤合成缝合线缝合。步骤:先用1-0大圆针可吸收缝
From December 1997 to December 1999, our hospital applied 192 cases of intradermal suture of perineal incision which can absorb non-destructive synthetic sutures in our hospital (observation group), and randomly selected 186 cases of traditional silk suture of perineal incision at the same period as the control group . The results are analyzed as follows. 1 Materials and Methods 1.1 General Information Two groups of pregnant women age, nutritional status, perineal incision indications were no different. Postoperative routine use of oral antibiotics to prevent infection. 1.2 surgical control group of 186 cases of conventional conventional suture, first with 1-0 catgut suture vaginal mucosa, perineal muscle, subcutaneous tissue, interrupted on the 4th silk suture the skin. 4d stitches, forceps incision 5d stitches. 192 cases of observation group with absorbable non-destructive synthetic suture suture. Steps: first with 1-0 large round needle can absorb the seam