论文部分内容阅读
“互文性”强调任何文本都不可能脱离其他文本而存在。“互文本”不仅指文学文本之间的相互作用,它也强调文学文本与文化文本之间的相互关系。基于这种理论,读者可以把《秋颂》放置在与之相联系的政治、经济、文学文本中,说出作者的未尽之言,道出《秋颂》中隐含的悖论:秋色以慷慨名义下的阴谋、秋人在懈怠中的劳作、秋声对自身局限的超越。《秋颂》中的这三对并置却彼此矛盾的悖论,恰恰实现了济慈“诗人无性格”的诗学主张。
“Intertextuality ” emphasizes that it is impossible for any text to exist independently of other texts. “Intertext ” not only refers to the interaction between literary texts, it also emphasizes the interrelationship between literary texts and cultural texts. Based on this theory, the reader can place the “Autumn Song” in the political, economic and literary texts associated with it and tell the author’s unfinished words and reveal the paradoxes hidden in “Autumn Songs”: Autumn Under the generous name of the conspiracy, the autumn work in slack, autumn sound on its own limitations beyond. The three paradoxes contradictory to each other in Autumn Song precisely realize the poetic proposition of Keats “poet no character”.