论文部分内容阅读
海军的注意力已经从全球战争情景转移到局部的、沿海偶然事件和冲突的复杂情况的准备状态。在作战上,舰上人员将必须有能力把注意力从作战系统多使命任务转移到纯单一使命上。从发展的观点来看,作战系统必须能在一个受预算制约的环境中不断引入技术。从作战和发展两方面来看,作战系统的结构是影响作战系统灵活性的唯一最重要的因素。 用一种横向综合方法把作战系统功能从基本原理上划分为探测、指挥和交战功能,以便提高所要求的灵活性。这种基本原理上的划分方法目前已应用于单独的武器系统,但还没有用于作为一个整体的作战系统。相反,过去往往是先研制自含式武器系统,然后再纵向综合成作战系统,从而减少了灵活性。 作战机构是对作战系统结构提出要求的主要因素。本文说明:在横向上综合作战系统的探测、指挥和交战,能最好地支持作战机构。可以断定,一个在横向上对探测、指挥和交战进行综合的综合作战系统结构应成为未来作战系统的选择。
Navy attention has shifted from the scenario of global war to the readiness of localized, coastal contingencies and the complexities of conflict. In combat, the ship’s personnel will have to be able to shift their attention from the multi-mission mission of a combat system to a single mission. From a development standpoint, the operational system must be able to continually introduce technology in a budget-constrained environment. From both operational and developmental perspectives, the structure of the operational system is the single most important factor that affects the flexibility of the operational system. In a cross-cutting synthesis approach, the operational system functions are divided, in principle, into exploration, command and warfighting functions in order to enhance the required flexibility. This basic rationale of partitioning has now been applied to individual weapon systems but has not been used in combat systems as a whole. On the contrary, the past was often to first develop self-contained weapons systems and then vertically integrate them into combat systems, thereby reducing flexibility. Combat agency is a major factor in the requirements of the operational system structure. This article shows that the integrated detection, commanding and belligerency of integrated combat systems in the horizontal direction best supports combat agencies. It can be concluded that a comprehensive integrated operational system structure that integrates exploration, command and warfare should be the choice of future operational systems.