论文部分内容阅读
下篇主要从课程设计思路、内容范围、实施建议三个方面明确《思品课标》与《96指引》的相同点与不同点,以便相互学习、相互借鉴,有效推进学校思想品德教育和公民教育。一、《思品课标》与《96指引》课程设计思路的比较(一)相同点1.《思品课标》和《96指引》都明确阐释了课程设计思路。《思品课标》辟“课程设计思路”专题加以阐释,《96指引》明确阐释了设计思路。《96指引》指出:“本课程范围根据上一章的理念架构而设计,内容涵盖了公民教育本土环
In the next part, we will clarify the similarities and differences between ”thinking standard curriculum standard“ and ”96 guidelines“ from the aspects of curriculum design idea, content scope and implementation suggestion so that we can learn from each other and learn from each other so as to effectively promote the ideological and moral education and citizens education. First, the ”Thinking of the standard course“ and ”96 Guidelines“ curriculum design ideas comparison (A) the same point 1. ”Thinking Course Standard“ and ”96 Guidelines“ clearly explain the course design ideas. ”Thinking of the standard curriculum“ provision ”curriculum design ideas “ topic to be explained, ”96 Guide“ clearly explains the design ideas. The 96 Guide states: ”The scope of this course is based on the conceptual architecture of the previous chapter, covering the inner circle of civic education