我不大赞同洪老师对《丑石》一文的看法。《丑石》的观点并没有错。理由是,“丑到极处,便是美到极处”,不应看作《丑石》的“观点”(即中心),而“不屈于误解、寂寞的生存的伟大”,才是《丑石》所要“宣扬的观点”。退一步说,纵使“丑到极处,便是美到极处”诚为《丑石》的观点,那也是不错的。作者并非蓄意混淆“美”(是)与“丑”(非)的界限,而制造混乱;谁也不会作“凡是丑的,都是美的”这样的误解。作者要说的 I do not agree with Professor Hong’s view of the article “Ugly Stone.” The view of “Ugly Stone” is not wrong. The reason is that “Ugliness is the most beautiful place” and it should not be regarded as the “point of view” (ie, the center) of “Ugly Stone”, but “the greatness of survival that is not misunderstood and lonely” is The “Ugly Stone” wants to “promote the point of view.” It is also good to say that even if the “Ugly Extremist is the United States to the Extreme” is the “Ugly Stone” viewpoint. The author does not intentionally confuse the boundaries between “beauty” (yes) and “uglyness” (non-) and create confusion; no one will misunderstand the misunderstanding that “every ugly thing is beautiful.” The author wants to say