在《政治常识》第二课“民主制度”的教学中,我遇见过这样一件事。我分析了民主作为一种国家制度,总是维护一定社会经济制度的民主。资本主义民主归根到底是为维护资本主义私有制服务的,社会主义民主则是为维护社会主义公有制服务的。当我讲到这里时,一个学生站起来说,现在社会主义国家都在搞多种经济成份并存,而资本主义国家也在发展国有经济,再从所有制上分析问题,是毫无意义的政治游戏。他的发言得到部分学生的赞同附和。当时,我马上板起脸孔,“居高临下”,对这位学生训斥了一顿。一刹时,教室里变得鸦雀无声,学生们个个禁若寒蝉。从这以后,政治课课堂气氛变得十分沉闷,师生关系渐趋紧张。这个教训对我十分深刻。对待学生中的一些模糊认识,如果我们动辄训斥压服,容易使他们产生逆反心理。正确的做法应该是在理解 In the teaching of “Democracy” in the second lesson of “Political Common Sense”, I encountered such a thing. I analyzed democracy as a national system and always maintained a certain socio-economic system of democracy. In the final analysis, capitalist democracy serves the maintenance of capitalist private ownership, while socialist democracy serves the maintenance of socialist public ownership. When I talked about this, a student stood up and said that the socialist countries are now engaged in coexistence of a variety of economic components. The capitalist countries are also developing the state-owned economy and analyzing the problems from the ownership system is a meaningless political game. . His speech was endorsed by some students. At that time, I immediately raised my face and “conquered” and scolded the student. In an instant, the classroom became silent and the students were all shivering. Since then, the classroom atmosphere in political classes has become very boring and the relationship between teachers and students has become tense. This lesson is very profound to me. Treating some of the student’s vague understandings, if we are reprimanded and convinced, makes it easy for them to develop rebellious psychology. The correct approach should be to understand