某小学的三年级语文考试,在一个班的测验卷上,不少学生用“温暖”一词形容天气。这样造句本无错误,由于判卷老师知识范围的限制,将凡是用“温暖”形容天气的句子都判成是错的。原任课老师指出这样判是不合适的,判卷老师除坚持己见外,还找主任、校长评理。出人意料地,主任、校长也认为用“温暖”形容天气不合适。双方各执己见,都摆出 A third-year primary school language test, in a class test volume, many students use the word “warm” to describe the weather. There is no mistake in making a sentence in this way. All the sentences that are described as “warm” are judged as wrong because of the limits of the knowledge of the judgment teachers. The original class teacher pointed out that this sentence is not appropriate, the verdict teacher in addition to persevere, but also to find director, principal comment. Surprisingly, the director, the principal also think that “warm” to describe the weather is not appropriate. The two sides each dishonest, have put