论文部分内容阅读
2007年的民事诉讼法的修改扩大了再审事由范围,2008年的最高院司法解释进一步细化了再审事由的内容,旨在提高再审事由的可操作性,然而由于再审程序的补充性,所以再审事由的设定不应当使再审成为一种具有普遍纠错意义的第三审程序,只有在有限的范围内才能适用。在民诉事由立法完善的过程中,应遵循补充性和确定性等原则。本文通过对我国现行民诉法和审判监督的司法解释中关于再审事由的规定进行剖析和思考,以期对完善我国再审事由有所裨益。
The revision of Civil Procedure Law in 2007 expanded the scope of retrial, and the judicial interpretation of the Supreme People's Court in 2008 further refined the content of retrial, aiming at improving the operability of retrial. However, due to the complementarity of the retrial procedure, The setting of causes should not make retrial a third-instance procedure of universal error correction and should be applied only to a limited extent. In the process of civil litigation due to legislative improvement, we should follow the principles of complementarity and certainty. In this paper, we analyze and think about the provisions on the cause of retrial in the current judicial interpretation of civil procedural law and trial supervision in our country, with a view to the improvement of our cause of retrial.