《曹刿论战》一文中,作者用史家笔法“唯书其事迹”而未对人物予以褒贬。由题目即可看出,中心人物应为曹刿,鲁庄公的出现似乎只是为了衬托曹刽的深谋远虑,体现“肉食者鄙,未能远谋”论断的正确性。当然,曹刿的确是一位位卑未敢忘忧国,具有卓越政治才能和军事才能的人才。但说鲁庄公是一个政治上低能,军事上弱智的平庸之君,则有失偏颇。 In the article “Cao Yu Controversy,” the author used the historian’s brushwork “only his deeds ” and did not criticize the characters. It can be seen from the title that the central figure should be Cao Yu. The appearance of Lu Zhuanggong seems only to set off Cao Yu’s deep-mindedness and to reflect the correctness of the “meat eater’s failure”. Of course, Cao Yu is indeed a talented person who has not dared to worry about the country and has excellent political skills and military skills. But to say that Lu Zhuanggong is a mediocre king who is politically low-powered and militarily mentally handicapped is biased.