论文部分内容阅读
一次与朋友谈起PHILIPS的显示器,在谈到15A与105A的时候,我们的意见发生了分歧。我始终认为105A的主体与15A相同,仅仅是附加了一些功能而已,但他却认为105A从根本——显像管上就与15A不同。谁也没法说眼谁,最后只有求助于PHILIPS的资料。 15A的资料上标明点距0.28毫米,而105A的资料上则声称其水平点距为0.241毫米。这样看来,似乎是105A更胜一筹。但是,恕我眼拙,一般显示器的点距低有0.22、0.25,中有0.28,高有0.31、0.39,怎么会突然冒出一个0.241呢?而且它的价格明显低于点距0.25毫米的显示器,仅仅比0.28显示器贵百元左右,这又是为什么呢?105A使用的显像管点距肯定是0.28毫米,这是毫无疑问的,可是这个概念模糊的水平点距又是什么东西
When I talked with my friends about PHILIPS monitors, we disagreed over 15A and 105A. I always thought that the main body of 105A is the same as 15A, only adding some functions, but he thinks 105A is different from 15A from the fundamental one. Who can not say who the eye, the last resort only to PHILIPS information. The 15A data indicates a pitch of 0.28 mm, whereas the 105A data indicates a horizontal pitch of 0.241 mm. It seems that 105A seems to be superior. However, forgive me, the general display of the low dot pitch 0.22,0.25, 0.28, 0.31,0.3 high, how can suddenly emerge a 0.241? And its price was significantly lower than 0.25mm dot pitch display, This is why? The dot pitch of the picture tube used by 105A is certainly 0.28mm, which is no doubt, but what is the fuzzy horizontal dot pitch of this concept?