论文部分内容阅读
荀子与后期法家(李斯、韩非等)的关系,是一个重要的哲学史课题。荀子对法家人物采取批评的态度,对法家的法、术、势理念也并不认同,是能守住儒家之为儒家的根本价值的。诚然,荀子构建的制度化礼学,包含有一种强势性和僵化的可能,所以是“大醇而小疵”。而后期法家虽然对儒学进行过系统学习,但因根本出发点的不同,反而以此为资源来排斥儒家,并建构了法家自身的理论。因此,荀子和法家之间更多的是距离感,而不是亲和关系;荀子当为“法儒”而不是“儒法”。
The relationship between Xunzi and the later legalists (Liszt, Han Fei, etc.) is an important subject of philosophy history. Xunzi’s attitude of criticizing the figures of Legalists also does not agree with the legalists’ concepts of law, technique and power, and they can hold Confucianism as the fundamental value of Confucianism. It is true that the institutionalized rites constructed by Xunzi contains a strong and rigid possibility, so it is “big alcohol and minor defect.” Although the later legalists systematically studied Confucianism, they were excluded from Confucianism because of their different starting points, and their own theories were constructed. Therefore, Xunzi and Legalists are more sense of distance rather than affinity; Xunzi should be “Legal Confucianism” rather than “Confucianism and Legalism.”