论文部分内容阅读
审稿质量决定刊物质量。随着学科的专业化程度越来越细,审稿时选择合适的审稿人成为关键。编辑部可通过多种途径选择审稿人,如:通过编辑积累选择;通过有关专家推荐;从学术会议上物色;从一流科学刊物上挑选;利用来稿参考文献选择;从编委中寻找。编辑部可在日常工作积累的基础上建立自己的审稿人数据库,并通过标准化的操作,不断提高审稿水平。选择认真负责、学术造诣深的专家,就能使审稿工作事半功倍。只有严把稿件质量关,才能最终提高刊物质量。
The quality of reviewers determines the quality of the publication. As subject disciplines become more and more specialized, it is crucial to select the right reviewers for review. Editors can choose reviewers in a variety of ways, such as: Editing and accumulating choices; recommending by experts; identifying from academic conferences; selecting from first-rate scientific journals; using contributions for reference selection; seeking out editorial staff. The editorial department may establish its own database of reviewers on the basis of daily work accumulation and continuously improve the level of reviewers through standardized operations. Choose a serious and responsible, academic attainments of experts, will be able to make the reviewer work more efficiently. Only strict quality manuscripts, in order to ultimately improve the quality of publications.