传统理论和观念认为 :群体思维的统一性、权威性、服从性似乎是领导决策人物的“法宝” ,如此才能表现出决策集团和领导班子的团结性、凝聚力和战斗力 ,因此往往在决策分析研究中提到批评意见 ,反对措施、分歧就“谈反色变”。作者认为这种传统观念意识和作为 ,从马克思主义唯物辩证法和思维心理学以及哲理上均是无据可依的、其失败和教训甚多。纵观现代管理学的演变和发展。至今国外学者的有关研究中 ,尚未提出建立一门领导冲突学的分支 (部门 )学科 ,故作者大胆提出此论 ,以求创新务实 ,抛砖引玉 ,共同研讨 The traditional theories and conceptions hold the view that the unity, authority and obedience of group thinking seem to be the “magic weapon” for the leaders and decision-makers, so as to show the unity, cohesion and combat effectiveness of the decision-making group and the leadership team. Therefore, Referred to the criticism, opposition measures, disagreement on “anti-color change.” The author believes that this traditional concept of awareness and behavior, from Marxist materialist dialectics and thinking psychology and philosophy are based on evidence-based, with many failures and lessons. Reviewing the Evolution and Development of Modern Management. So far, no relevant research on foreign scholars has proposed the establishment of a branch (department) discipline that will lead conflict science, so the author boldly put forward this theory so as to seek for innovation and pragmatism, start a discussion and discuss together