刘勰在《文心雕龙·比兴》篇中,对“兴”义的描述本可按照当时已经明朗的审美路线进行阐发,但刘勰描述“兴”的概念,以毛诗、郑笺、离骚经为依据对象,从它的经学诠释意义出发,旨在讽谏教化。造成此种现象的原因:刘勰的经学趋向、“兴”具有浓厚的经学传统、指责作文时弊。 In his article “Wen Xin Diao Long · Bei Xing”, Liu Xie’s description of “Xing” may have been elucidated according to the already clear aesthetic line at the time, but Liu Xie described the concept of “Xing” Zheng Jian, Li Sao by the object, from its interpretation of the significance of the classics, aimed at satirical remonstrance. Reasons for this phenomenon: Liu Xun’s tendency to study Confucian classics, “Hing” has a strong tradition of classics, accusing proseics of shortcomings.