关于反训的有无,近来有不同的看法,因此在教学上,对有关反训字眼的解释也就不一样。比如售有买卖两义,在解释也就不一样。在解释买义上,主张没有反训的人,说是卖义的使动用法,是使卖出,然后再说,使卖出就是买。这样解释在逻辑上自然不准确。有人又认为反训是一种方法,即古汉语一个词的正反两义是后人用后来意思解释出 There has been a recent divergence of views on the existence of anti-training and therefore there is a difference in teaching about the interpretation of anti-precepts. Such as the sale of two meanings, in the explanation is not the same. In explaining the meaning of purchase, those who advocate that there is no anti-lexical order say that the law of selling righteousness is to sell, and then to say that selling is to buy. This interpretation is logically inaccurate. Some people think that anti-training is a method, that is, the meaning of the ancient Chinese is a positive and negative meaning of later interpretation of the meaning