《新闻记者》1988年第6期,发表了一篇题为《实行社长领导下的总经理负责制》(编者注:应为“实行社长领导下的总编辑、总经理负责制”)的文章。文中说:“实行社长领导下的总编辑、总经理负责制,由总编辑领导报社的采编业务,总经理领导报社的经营管理,总编辑、总经理共同对社长负责。”並说这是根据国内外的经验得出的“报纸的最佳领导方式”。我对国内外报纸的领导方式没有研究,只是觉得这个提法不怎么确切。既然是“社长领导”,就应该由社长负责。领导怎么可以不负责呢?从文中所 “Journalist” No. 6, 1988, published an article entitled “President under the leadership of the general manager responsibility system” (Editor’s Note: Should be “the implementation of the president under the leadership of the chief editor, general manager responsibility system”) The article. The article said: “The implementation of president under the leadership of the chief editor, general manager responsibility system, led by the editor in chief editor of the newspaper business, the general manager of the newspaper newspaper’s management, chief editor, general manager of the president responsible.” And that this Is based on the experience at home and abroad drawn “the newspaper’s best leadership.” I did not study the leadership style of newspapers at home and abroad, I just feel that this formulation is not very precise. Since it is the “president of leadership”, it should be responsible for the president. How can leaders not be responsible?