论文部分内容阅读
在中国的刑事审判实践中,比较普遍的存在着诸如裁定撤诉、死刑缓期两年执行、缓刑、“关多久判多久”、管制、免于刑事处罚等实质上介于有罪和无罪之间的“折中裁判”。“折中裁判”的存在有着极大的制度危害,不仅不利于被告人人权的保护,更不利于司法公信力的树立、侦查能力的提高和法律职业群体的专业化发展。解决“折中裁判”问题的方案,除了惯常的司法独立方案之外,更在于从程序分流层面减少进入正式审判的证据不足案件数量,以及从程序技术上压缩法院的裁量空间。
In China’s criminal trial practice, there are generally such as the verdict of withdrawal, the death penalty is suspended for two years, probation, “how long sentence” how long, control, exempt from criminal penalties in essence, between guilty and innocent Between the “compromise referee ”. The existence of the “intermediary judge” has tremendous institutional damage. It is not only unfavorable to the protection of defendants’ human rights, but also unfavorable to the establishment of judicial credibility, the improvement of investigative ability and the professional development of legal professionals. The solution to the “compromise” issue is not only the customary judicial independence scheme, but also the reduction of the number of evidence-based cases entering the formal trial from the procedural diversion level and the reduction of the court’s discretion in procedural techniques.