论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比奥硝唑与甲硝唑在治疗滴虫性阴道炎上发挥的临床疗效;方法:将78例滴虫性阴道炎患者分为观察组(奥硝唑治疗)和对照组(甲硝唑治疗),对比两组患者的临床疗效和不良反应发生率;结果:1星期后,观察组总有效率(92.3%)明显高于对照组(79.4%),观察组不良反应发生率(21.6%)低于对照组(69.2%),且P<0.05;讨论:在治疗滴虫性阴道炎上奥硝唑的临床疗效优于甲硝唑,不良反应发生率低,值得推广和应用。
Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of ornidazole and metronidazole in the treatment of trichomonas vaginitis.Methods: 78 cases of trichomonas vaginitis were divided into observation group (ornidazole treatment) and control group And the incidence of adverse reactions was compared between the two groups. Results: After 1 week, the total effective rate (92.3%) in the observation group was significantly higher than that in the control group (79.4%), and the incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group (21.6 %) Was lower than the control group (69.2%), and P <0.05. Discussion: The clinical efficacy of ornidazole in the treatment of trichomonas vaginitis was better than metronidazole, the incidence of adverse reactions is low, worthy of promotion and application.