论文部分内容阅读
自始不能责任渊源于罗马法上的杰尔苏规则,对其的正确理解应当是仅排除债权人的实际履行请求权,而不是整个合同一起归为无效,这就意味着应当向债权人赔偿积极利益。自始客观不能与自始主观不能在目的上并不存在根本不同,因此应当为二者规定相同的法律效果。自始不能与嗣后不能在准据时点上存在着偶然性,因此同样应当为二者建立相同的责任后果。为此,应当以债务人不履行给付允诺解决传统框架下体系违反与学理不规则的问题。立法与学理应当通过互动而实现统一,单纯地突出学理的服务功能并不妥当。
Since the incapacity originated from the Gerolsu rule in Roman law, the correct understanding of the law should be to exclude only the obligee’s right of actual performance, not to nullify the entire contract together, which means that creditors should be compensated for positive benefits . Since the objective objectivity can not be fundamentally different from the original subjectiveness, the same legal effect should be prescribed for both. From the beginning can not and later can not be based on the existence of contingency point, so the same should be to establish the same responsibility consequences. Therefore, we should solve the problem of system violation and irregular learning under the traditional framework, with the promise of non-performance by the debtor. Legislation and learning should be achieved through interaction and unity, simply to highlight the theoretical functions of the service is not appropriate.