笔者曾经代理过一个民间借贷的再审案件,案件情节大致如下:原告在起诉时声称作为被告之一的丈夫因生意需要在从2007年至2012年近5年的时间内共从其处借款96万多元,虽然两被告之间已经离婚,但该些债务发生在夫妻关系存续期间,故应当由两被告共同承担偿还责任。原告为证明其主张,向法院提供了一张由 The author once acted as a retrial case on private lending. The case was roughly as follows: The plaintiff asserted at the time of prosecution that her husband, as one of the defendants, needed to borrow a total amount of 960,000 from her office during the five years from 2007 to 2012 due to business needs Pluralistic. Although the divorces have been divorced between the two defendants, the debts occurred during the existence of the husband-wife relationship. Therefore, the two defendants should jointly assume the responsibility of repayment. The plaintiff provided the court with a proof of his claim