论文部分内容阅读
刑事诉讼中的主体间性并非对主体性的颠覆,而是诉讼现实中的主体性,是体现诉讼特质的主体性。刑事诉讼必须尊重被追诉人主体性,避免其客体无权地位,但同时,被追诉人作为追诉对象的实质不能改变。因此应打破被追诉人“主体或客体”非此即彼的二元角色设定,从追诉与保护平衡关系来认识主体性内涵。单向度地看待沉默权,势必将其妨碍侦查的效果无限放大,只有将其置于与讯问权关系的视野中,这一权利的可操作性才能得以显现。从讯问权有效性角度考量限定沉默权边界,在我国不失为一条可能破除观念障碍的路径。
The inter-subjectivity in criminal procedure is not the subversion of subjectivity, but the subjectivity in the litigation reality and the subjectivity of the characteristic of litigation. Criminal proceedings must respect the subjectivity of the accused and avoid the non-privilege of the object. At the same time, the essence of the accused can not be changed as the object of prosecution. Therefore, we should break the dual role of “the subject or the object” that is the subject or the subject, and understand the subjective connotation from the balance between prosecution and protection. To view the right to silence unilaterally is bound to magnify its effect of hindering the investigation. Only by placing it in the field of vision of interrogation can the operability of this right be revealed. Considering the boundary of the right of silence from the perspective of the validity of the right of accession, in our country, it is a path that can eliminate the ideological obstacle.