后殖民理论在建设多元文化的问题上 ,提倡“流放”的知识分子立场的混质文化 ,实际是把摆脱霸权的希望寄托在寻找一劳永逸的立足点之上 ,从而陷入了该“立足点”的特殊与各“地位点”的平等之间的矛盾 ,同时也忽略了文化是一个变化发展的过程。本文认为摆脱霸权不能依靠一个稳固的立足点 ,而只能依靠人的主体性和创造性 ,通过对文化中的霸权因素、对自我以及对自身理论的批判 ,不断纠偏寻正 ;只有通过“批判—建设—批判”的螺旋前进 ,人类才可能摆脱存在于文化之间、之内的霸权而最终走向自由。 On the issue of building a pluralistic culture, postcolonial theory advocates the mixed culture of “exiled” intellectual positions. It actually places the hope of escaping hegemony on the search for a once-and-for-all foothold, thus falling into the “standpoint” The contradiction between the special and the equality of “points of position” also ignores the fact that culture is a process of change and development. This dissertation holds the view that hegemony can not be relied on a solid foothold but can only rely on the subjectivity and creativity of human beings and continuously rectify and correct it through the hegemonic factors in culture and the criticism of himself and his own theory. Only through “criticism- Construction - critical ”spiral, human beings may be able to get rid of the hegemony that exists within the culture, eventually moving toward freedom.