在西方哲学方法论的影响下,许多新的概念或者表达大量涌入,如“论证”、“论辩”或者英语的“argument”、“argumentation”、“demonstration”等等数不胜数,然而在使用中却问题百出。本文借近三年的“中国期刊全文数据库”“文史哲”的目录下的“精确”搜索到的核心期刊发表的191篇论文对“论证”及“论辩”的概念的使用和英文对应的翻译的统计,发现在语言学目录下的论文错误百出。 Under the influence of Western philosophical methodologies, many new concepts or expressions have flooded into places such as “argument ”, “argument ” or English “argument ”, “argumentation ”, “demonstration And so on are numerous, however, in use are problematic. In this paper, 191 papers published in core journals searched by the ”accurate“ under the directory of ”Chinese Journal Full-text Database “, ”Literature and History and Philosophy“ ”The use of the concept and English translation of the corresponding statistics found in the linguistic list of papers under the error.