论文部分内容阅读
目的:分析胸部外伤合并血气胸患者采用胸腔闭式引流与负压胸腔引流的临床疗效。方法:择取我院2014年1月-2015年10月收治的胸部外伤合并血气胸患者86例设置为本次的观察对象,按照信封随机分组法分为各占据43例的常规组与实验组,分别采取胸腔闭式引流与负压胸腔引流方案,比较两组的应用效果。结果:实验组患者的出血时间、引流量、肺复张时间均明显优于常规组,P值小于0.05。结论:对于胸部外伤合并血气胸患者来说,给予负压胸腔引流的应用效果显著,值得推荐采纳。
Objective: To analyze the clinical effects of closed thoracic drainage and negative pressure chest drainage in patients with chest trauma and hemopneumothorax. Methods: Eighty-six patients with thoracic trauma and pneumothorax admitted from January 2014 to October 2015 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. According to the envelope randomization method, they were divided into routine group and experimental group , Respectively, to take closed chest drainage and negative pressure chest drainage program, the application effect of the two groups were compared. Results: The bleeding time, drainage volume and time of pulmonary expiration in the experimental group were significantly better than those in the conventional group, P value was less than 0.05. Conclusion: For chest trauma patients with pneumothorax, the application of negative pressure chest drainage effect is significant, it is recommended to adopt.