《曹刿论战》中作者通过对比反衬手法的运用去着意刻画曹刿的形象 ,就文学作品而言 ,这是无可非议的。然“肉食者鄙”中的“肉食者”含庄公吗 ?笔者认为庄公未必“鄙”。理由有四 :其一 ,庄公能接贤纳谏 ,有明主之风范。当时没有常备军 ,由国君任统帅 ,贵族任各级军官 ,在战前 The author of “Cao Yu Controversy” deliberately portrays Cao Yu’s image by comparing the use of counter-lining techniques. For literary works, this is beyond reproach. But does the “meat eater” in “meat eater” contain Zhuanggong? The author thinks that Zhuanggong may not be “squeaky.” There are four reasons: First, Zhuanggong can accept talents and show his style. There was no standing army at that time, and the commander-in-chief was the commander of the monarch. The nobles served as officers of all ranks before the war.