论文部分内容阅读
童庆炳主编的《文学理论教程》和王先霈、孙文宪主编的《文学理论导引》作为不同年代的文学理论教材,反映了不同条件下文学理论研究的成果,二者有一定的可比性。基于它们所产生的社会历史条件不同,教材在具体内容上也存在一定的差异性,从而使教材在内容本身方面和学生接受方面都呈现出各自不同的特点。从二者的比较中我们认为,文学理论教材既要扎根于自古而今的文学活动和现象的现实土壤中,又要有勇气吸纳多方的理论资源,实现兼收并蓄,综合创新。
Tong Qingbing’s “Theories of Literary Theories” and Wang Xianpi and Sun Wenxian’s “Theories of Literary Theories”, as literary theory textbooks of different ages, reflect the research results of literary theory under different conditions. Both of them have certain comparability. Due to their different social and historical conditions, there are also some differences in the specific content of the textbooks, so that the textbooks have their own different characteristics in terms of the content itself and the students’ acceptance. From the comparison between the two, we think that the teaching materials of literary theory should not only be rooted in the realistic soil of literary activities and phenomena since ancient times, but also have the courage to absorb the theoretical resources of multifaceted and achieve eclectic and comprehensive innovation.