论文部分内容阅读
[目的]反映我国中文学术期刊采用国际通用学术诚信控制机制的现状。[方法]依据《中文核心期刊要目总览(2011年版)》,采用简单随机抽样法,从各个一级学科中分别抽取20%的期刊(共401种)作为研究样本,以各个期刊2015年第1期印本及其官方网站为依据,调查各期刊采用作者贡献声明、采用潜在利益冲突声明、要求研究数据公开、要求责任编辑公开的情况。[结果]样本期刊中99%以上期刊没有提供作者贡献声明,98%以上期刊未提及任何原始数据信息,没有一种样本期刊提供潜在利益冲突声明,48.38%期刊给出了每篇论文的责任编辑。[结论]我国中文学术期刊很少采用国际通用的学术诚信控制机制。建议学术期刊应全面采用学术诚信控制机制,提高对学术诚信进行细化、可操作、可检验、可比较以及可问责的检验能力。
[Objective] To reflect the status quo of adopting the international universal academic integrity control mechanism in Chinese academic journals. [Methods] According to the “Outline of Chinese Core Journals (2011 Edition)”, a simple random sampling method was used to extract 20% of the journals (401 species in total) from all the first-level disciplines as research samples. 1 print and its official website as the basis for the investigation of the periodicals using the author’s contribution statement, the use of potential conflicts of interest statement, research data disclosure, requiring the editorial responsibility of the situation. [Results] More than 99% of the periodicals did not provide authors’ contribution statements, 98% of the periodicals did not mention any original data information, and none of the sample periodicals provided a potential conflict of interest statement. 48.38% of the periodicals gave the responsibility of each thesis edit. [Conclusion] Chinese academic journals seldom adopt the control mechanism of international academic integrity. It is suggested that academic journals should make full use of the academic integrity control mechanism to improve the ability to refine, manipulate, test, compare and accountability of academic honesty.