论文部分内容阅读
在跟单信用证结算方式下,经常发生单证不符的情况。针对不符,通常的解决办法主要有以下三种:一是电请开证人修改信用证,使单据与修改后的证相符,交单结汇;二是向议付行(信用证指定的银行,一般也是通知行)申请不符(点)电结汇;三是受益人出具担保函,申请结汇。后两种办法是否存在隐患和风险,如何采取措施进行防范?本文将根据国际商会制定的《跟单信用证统一惯例(1993年修订本)》有关精神,对此进行讨论和分析。
In the way of documentary letter of credit settlement, the situation of document inconsistency often occurs. In view of the discrepancy, the usual solutions mainly include the following three types: First, the electric issuer revises the L/C to match the document with the amended certificate, and pays the bill for settlement; the second is to the negotiating bank (Bank designated by the L/C, generally It is also the advising bank) The application does not match (point) the electricity exchange settlement; Third, the beneficiary issues the guarantee letter, apply for settlement. Whether there are hidden dangers and risks in the latter two methods and how to take measures to prevent them? This article will discuss and analyze this issue in accordance with the spirit of the Uniform Customs and Practice for Documentary Credits (1993 Revision) formulated by the International Chamber of Commerce.