论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析腹腔镜直肠癌根治术和传统开腹直肠癌手术的疗效。方法:选取2014年07月—2017年07月期间在我院治疗的直肠癌患者100例为研究对象,将其分为2组,对照组50例患者采用传统开腹直肠癌手术治疗,观察组50例患者采用腹腔镜直肠癌根治术治疗,并对两组临床疗效进行比较。结果:观察组手术情况显著优于对照组(P<0.05);且观察组术后并发症发生率12.00%显著低于对照组的50.00%,两组比较差异具统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:腹腔镜直肠癌根治术与传统开腹直肠癌手术相比,具有术中出血少、术后恢复快、住院时间短等特点,临床疗效显著,值得推广。
Objective: To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic resection of rectal cancer and traditional open rectal cancer. Methods: A total of 100 patients with rectal cancer treated in our hospital from July 2014 to July 2017 were selected and divided into 2 groups. 50 patients in the control group were treated with traditional open rectal cancer surgery. Fifty patients were treated with laparoscopic radical resection of the rectal cancer, and the clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared. Results: The observation group was significantly better than the control group (P<0.05). The incidence rate of postoperative complications in the observation group was significantly lower than that of the control group (12.00%, 50.00%). There was a significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). . Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer has the advantages of less intraoperative blood loss, faster postoperative recovery, and shorter hospital stay than traditional open rectal cancer surgery. The clinical curative effect is significant and worthy of promotion.