欧洲传统国际私法与美国现代冲突法在立法政策上的差异 ,主要源于二者对法律冲突的性质以及解决法律冲突所要实现目标的分歧。晚近 ,两大国际私法体系在可能的限度内兼容对方的立法政策 ,推动了整个国际私法立法的合理化进程。我国国际私法以传统的冲突规则为主体 ,在有限的范围内吸纳了美国现代冲突法的理论和方法 ,这种立法政策的基本取向是正确的 ,但在今后立法中仍需拓宽最密切联系原则和选择性冲突规则的适用范围 The differences between the traditional private international law in Europe and the modern law of conflict in the United States on the legislative policy are mainly due to the nature of the conflict over the law and the disagreement over the goal to be solved by the conflict of laws. Recently, the two systems of private international law are compatible with each other’s legislative policies to the extent possible, and promote the rationalization of the entire international private law. The private international law of our country takes the traditional conflict rules as the main body and absorbs the theories and methods of the American modern conflict law within a limited scope. The basic orientation of this legislative policy is correct. However, in the future legislation, it is still necessary to broaden the principle of the most intimate contact And the scope of application of the rules of selective conflict