对国际商事仲裁程序中的争议事项的可仲裁性问题的研究，并不仅仅局限在理论上，在司法实践中，它还是法院决定是否根据当事人的申请撤销仲裁裁决或不予执行仲裁裁决所必须解决的首要问题。从各国对商事仲裁的受案范围来看，越来越多的国家对争议事项的可仲裁性问题采取了“放宽”的态度。而作为《纽约公约》的参加国，我国现行的《仲裁法》中关于仲裁事项的范围规定与《纽约公约》的相关规定存在差异，因此有必要从法理上对“可仲裁性”问题进行研究，以促进国内涉外经济贸易仲裁事业的进一步发展 The research on the arbitrability of disputes in international commercial arbitration proceedings is not limited to theory. In judicial practice, it is also necessary for the court to decide whether to withdraw the arbitration award or not to enforce the arbitration award on the basis of the party’s application Solved the primary problem. Judging from the scope of the arbitration cases accepted by various countries, more and more countries adopt “relaxed” attitudes on the arbitrability of disputes. As a participant state of New York Convention, the scope of arbitration in our country’s Arbitration Law differs from the relevant provisions of the New York Convention. Therefore, it is necessary to study the issue of “arbitrability” from the jurisprudence So as to promote the further development of domestic foreign economic and trade arbitration