论文部分内容阅读
一、美学界对美的实践本质的错误解释美的本质问题在美学史上争论两千年之久而无定论。马克思主义实践观的诞生为美学研究注入了新的生机。马克思主义实践美学观从此产生。美根源于实践,美的本质应该在人类实践中去寻求,这是实践美学观的根本思想。但当年的马克思在有关美的本质问题上,既没有作过系统的论证和完整和概括,更没有下过一个确切的定义,这就给后人留下了广阔的思考空间。于是,假借马克思,便出现许多关于美的实践本质的概括。且不说这些概括是否符合马克思的原意,单只是它们本身造成的逻辑矛盾,就足以证明其错误。仅以我国美学界为例:
First, the esthetic circle misunderstands the essence of the practice of the United States The essence of the United States argues for two thousand years in the history of aesthetics and is inconclusive. The birth of Marxist practice has infused new vitality into the study of aesthetics. Marxist practical aesthetics has arisen from this. The root of beauty stems from practice. The essence of beauty should be sought in the practice of mankind, which is the basic idea of practicing aesthetics. However, Marx did not make any systematic definition, completeness or summaries on the essence of beauty, nor did he reach a precise definition. This left vast space for thinking for future generations. Thus, under the guise of Marx, many generalizations about the essence of the practice of beauty emerge. Not to mention whether these generalizations are in line with Marx’s original intention or not, the logical contradictions caused by them alone are enough to prove their mistakes. Take the aesthetic circle in our country as an example: