论文部分内容阅读
近年来,关于情报研究成果的评价问题不少文章已经作了较为详细的讨论,归纳起来,情报研究成果的价值不外乎潜在价值和直接价值两部分,也可以用内在质量特征参数和外在质量特征参数来表示。前者表现为情报研究成果的内在属性,后者则是情报用户对于前者的客观反映,是前者的实践结果。不少文章就情报研究成果的评价指标体系提出了较为深刻的见解,有些还进行了定量的计算。但是,这种将定性判断的指标化为定量计算的指标的讨论还见之不多,因此,本文想作一些这方面的探讨,并偿试使用系统工程中的层次分析法(或AHP法)对情报研究的成果评价作一些从定性到定量的探索。
In recent years, many articles on the evaluation of intelligence research results have been discussed in more detail. To sum up, the value of intelligence research is nothing more than the two parts of potential value and direct value. It is also possible to use internal quality characteristic parameters and externalities Quality characteristic parameters to represent. The former shows the inherent properties of intelligence research results, while the latter reflects the former's objective reflection of intelligence users, which is the former practice result. Many articles on the intelligence research results of the evaluation index system put forward a more profound insights, and some also conducted a quantitative calculation. However, there are not many discussions on how to use qualitative indicators as indicators of quantitative calculation. Therefore, this article would like to make some discussions in this respect and try to use the analytic hierarchy process (or AHP method) Some qualitative and quantitative exploration of the evaluation of intelligence research results.