论文部分内容阅读
孙中山作为20世纪中国伟大的政治家,在他去世之后,不同政治派别基于各自的政治立场,根据其政治需要,对于孙中山的事功与思想,就有了各自不同的言说,塑造出颇具差异的孙中山形象。其中,宋庆龄因其特殊的身份,其言说具有相当的权威性,并一定程度影响到孙中山形象的建构。这些阐述随时代背景的不同而有所侧重,亦可见其一以贯之的脉络。宋庆龄的孙中山论述,力图淡化晚年孙中山同共产党在政治思想上的分别。其要因在于:她的政治选择,是基于其对孙中山政治思想的理解;她对孙中山思想的论述,又一定程度基于其自身的政治倾向。宋庆龄可能更愿被视为孙中山思想事业的忠实继承者,与孙中山晚年思想毫无二致;而不愿被视为后来突破了孙中山思想的局限,“从民主主义者转变为共产主义者”。
After his death, Sun Yat-sen, as a great statesman in the 20th century, had different opinions based on his own political stance and the political needs of Sun Yat-sen in accordance with his political needs and created quite different opinions Sun Yat-sen image. Among them, Soong Ching Ling because of their special status, his speech has considerable authority, and to a certain extent, affect the construction of Sun Yat-sen’s image. These expositions have focused on the different backgrounds of the times. We can also see that they have a coherent context. Soong Chingling’s argument about Sun Yat-sen tried to downplay the difference between Sun Yat-sen and the Communist Party in political thought in his later years. The reason is that: her political choice is based on her understanding of Sun Yat-sen’s political thought; and her account of Sun Yat-sen’s thought is, to some extent, based on her own political inclination. Soong Ching Ling may prefer to be regarded as a loyal successor to Sun Yat-sen’s ideological cause, which is no different from Sun Yat-sen’s later years of thought, rather than as a limitation that later broke through Sun Yat-sen’s thinking and “transformed from a democracy to a communist.”