民国时期江苏的丝绸业和丝茧业围绕限制和开放茧行的设立,进行了长期的纷争,商会、官厅乃至省议会都先后卷入其中,并于1920年引发了南京机工捣毁省议会和殴掳议员的暴力案件,受到社会舆论的关注。结合当时的实际情况,纷争各方各有理由,很难简单而明确地分辨出谁是谁非。不过,此案足以表明,要想单纯通过政府实施带强制性而又与公平竞争原则相悖的行政命令,来解决市场经济发展过程中遇到的纷争,虽可暂行一时,却不能行之久远,而且也无法从根本上解决问题。 During the period of the Republic of China, the silk industry and silk cocoons industry of Jiangsu conducted long-term disputes about the establishment of the cocoon line of restriction and opening up. The Chamber of Commerce, the Guanting Hall and even the provincial council were successively involved in it. In 1920, Nanjing Machineman smashed the provincial council and Violent cases involving parliamentarians have drawn the attention of the public opinion. Combined with the actual situation at that time, all parties to the dispute have every reason to find out who is right or wrong simply and clearly. However, the case is sufficient to show that in order to solve the disputes in the process of market economy development simply by the government implementing executive orders that are compulsory and contradictory to the principle of fair competition, it may be temporary but not long-term. But also can not fundamentally solve the problem.