论文部分内容阅读
将科研成果纳入知识的利用,是科学共同体的首要之务。本文将以喀麦隆为例加以论述。该研究以行动主义为理论依据,对200个研究人员、决策者和委派研究机构进行了问卷调查,并辅以访谈,获得了1990年至2001年关于研究委派、评价和成果利用的资料。研究结果表明,研究者、决策者和研究委派机构对现状和成果的最优利用看法不一。这种分歧说明喀麦隆在合宜的学术兴趣、政策前景和研究资金结构之间缺乏联系,以致发现问题与解决问题脱钩。鉴于科研成果在公共政策中得不到充分利用,本文提议进行体制改革,使之激发学界思考社会工程的实际要求。
The integration of scientific research into the utilization of knowledge is the primary task of the scientific community. This article will be discussed in Cameroon. Using activism as a theoretical basis, the study conducted a survey of 200 researchers, policymakers and delegated research institutes, supplemented by interviews, and obtained data from 1990 to 2001 on research assignments, evaluations, and use of results. The results show that researchers, decision makers and research agencies have mixed opinions on the optimal use of status quo and outcomes. This disagreement shows that Cameroon lacks a connection between appropriate academic interests, policy prospects and the structure of research funds, so that problems are uncovered and problems are resolved. In view of the fact that scientific research can not be fully utilized in public policy, this paper proposes to reform the system so as to stimulate the academic community to think about the actual requirements of social engineering.